WSA to push for mandatory sewer tie-ins
That’s the question on the minds of many other city officials. During an extended presentation on sewers, WSA Executive Director Janine Burke said that, on average, about 60 percent of the people who can connect to the sewer system have done so in the Greenwich Bay area. And the numbers for the rest of the city are similar.
Almost 3,000 properties throughout the city that could connect to the sewer line haven’t. Technically, there is a mandatory connection system in the city, but it’s toothless. Residents who can, but refuse to connect, aren’t financially penalized.
There is a mechanism in state law that could potentially allow the WSA to charge residents who are not connected to the sewer line between $100 and $500 per day, as a public health nuisance. But the law as written, could be hard for the WSA to enforce, said Burke.
“It would be hard for us to prove, on a case to case basis in court, that one person’s cesspool is a public health nuisance,” she said.
Thus far, the WSA hasn’t gone that route, Burke said.
For this year, the connection statistics aren’t very impressive, she said.
“We have one more month left, and I don’t think we’re going to do too well with connections,” said Burke.
In a nutshell, the reasoning behind the need for residents who can connect to the sewer line to do so is twofold: it’s the best for the environment and it will provide the WSA with the necessary operational revenue it needs to keep going.
The WSA believes it could reap tens of millions of additional dollars per year in funding if those who can connect to the sewer line do.
But while Ginaitt suggested offering WSA coffee mugs to residents who complied with the mandate—an incentive, no doubt—the full committee has a penalty for those who don’t connect in store.
The committee unanimously agreed to go forward with a request to the city council to allow it to begin charging Warwick residents who choose not to connect to the sewer line approximately what their sewer usage bill would be were they connected to the system.
That could be a tough sell before the council, which unanimously voted against a fine for residents who refuse to connect to the sewer system in 2007.
Even at that point, well before the stock market and housing crashes of 2008, several council members said they couldn’t in good conscience pass on thousands of dollars in new costs to already struggling property owners. The move, they said, is akin to forcing people with financial problems of their own to make up for the unwise financial decisions of the WSA in the past.
The current WSA assessment rate is $82 per linear foot of property. That means a person with a 100-foot lot will pay $8,200 in assessment costs. Those costs can be financed over 20 years, albeit with a relatively high WSA assessment rate. The assessment is charged whether a landowner connects or not.
Councilman John DelGiudice (Ward-5) recently said he wasn’t in favor of a mandatory connection fee during an interview with the Beacon. Council President Bruce Place (Ward-2) has also said he hasn’t made his mind up on the issue.
Councilman Steve Colantuono (Ward-1) said he’s in favor of a mandatory tie-in system, so long as it’s implemented citywide.
The WSA, as well as Mayor Scott Avedisian, argue that more people connected to the sewer line spreads the costs throughout the system, creating a more fair and equitable funding system.
They also argue that people who choose not to connect to the system are “not paying their fair share,” according to a presentation Burke did on the mandatory connection program.
The Warwick City Council has scheduled an open-ended meeting with the WSA. Burke said she hopes the two government entities will get into the mandatory connection issue on that date.
The meeting is slated for Dec. 16 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall.
similar stories
Council opposes fee for those not connected to sewer | 2 years ago
Mandatory sewer tie-ins back on authority agenda | 24 months ago
Sewer connect fee may need council approval | 2 years ago
Editorial: Compromise on connect capable fee | 2 years ago
Letters: Voting for what she believes in | 2 years ago
More News Stories
event calendar
Friday, 03, 2010
post a new event
post a new event
Warwick Veteran's Memo... 7:00 AM
The Warwick Veteran's Memorial High School...
Pilgrim High School Cl... 12:00 AMPilgrim High School Class of 1970 will hol...
EAST GREENWICH ART CLU... 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM EAST GREENWICH ART CLUB
P.O.Box 1608, East...
URI Feinstein Providen... 9:00 AM URI Feinstein Providence Campus Urban Arts...
software copyright © 2008 Matchbin, inc. content copyright © 2008 Warwick Beacon
read our privacy policy
Warwick Beacon is in Warwick, Rhode Island
read our privacy policy
Warwick Beacon is in Warwick, Rhode Island
Community

Perhaps sell one of your multiple houses, and help those of us who can barely afford to live, pay our tie in fee.
Is it because the Mayor has done nothing to control the WSA? Steve owes his election to the Mayor so like usual he asks the Mayor what he should do. Steve, why don't you be a man and do what your constitutents want...vote NO for mandatory connections.
This guy has done nothing to represent us in ward 1.
The Ward 2 council woman as done more to help protect our pocket books then good old Stevie.
Come to the special city council meeting on Dec 16 when a public hearing will be held with the sewer authority before the council to answer questions.
Who the hell would want a coffee mug that says "WSA" on it? That is the stupidest incentive I have ever heard. How about a little off property taxes, water bill, something that we all need help with.
What about the Stimulus money, I never have reason to got to the courthouse to hear the birds chirping, so how did that purchase benefit me as a Warwick resident!
The WSA was and still is grossly mismanaged. No Warwick resident should be forced to connect to a failing system. The Mayor should also take responsibilty for the failure at WSA.
The only people who can connect are the employees of the city and state who like Mr. Giaitt receive these OUTRAGEOUS PENSIONS.