Weather Forecast
49°, mostly cloudy
Dear Scal,
I contributed over $38,000 (your number was off) of my own money to my campaign, preferring to put my money where my mouth was rather that use "other peoples money" like Mayor Avedisian did.As a result, I received more votes than any previous Avedisian opponent in 16 years!
As you know, I allowed no Political Action Committee (PAC) donations. Scott Avedisian by contrast received 237 PAC checks. In the history of the United States there has NEVER BEEN ONE DONATION from one Political Action Committee that didn't have an expectation (demand?) of preferential treatment after the election. That is the ONLY reason a candidate gets a PAC check. You know that Scal. You were one of those checks! My 13,278 votes were received the old fashioned way. I earned every one of them! I campaigned for over 700 days in a row and I EARNED THEM! My supporters Scal, are LOYAL SUPPORTERS. Avedisians are "bought and paid for" and will have to be "bought and paid for" in the 2018 election as well. My 13,278 supporters won't receive kick-back jobs, eliminated or lowered water bills, of any other "preferential treatment. My 13,278 will only get larger in 2018. Why? Because I am solely accountable to the 80,000 Warwick taxpayers, not the 237 PACs that now have their hand out to Avedisian. My programs benefit everyone and I clearly explained them many times. (You even commented that you agreed with them until the Mayor told you to attack me on them instead.)
Here's my point. Last election I gained 13,278 votes which are now 13,278 loyal supporters. That's what you political insiders call "a base".
See you in 2018 Scal. No one has a more loyal "base".than Corrente-for-Mayor. Face it Scal. Without 237 Political Action Committees backing him, Avedisian would never have received the amount of votes he got. I believe he would have lost the election to me. He owes the election to you and I am sure you told him that.
Happy Spring Scal.
Happy Spring everyone.
Rick Corrente
The Taxpayers Mayor (not the Political insiders)
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
