Report Inappropriate Comments

To Michael2012, I would not laugh to loud. When the present terminal was expanded under Bruce Sundlun the length of runway 16/34 was continuously brought up to the FAA regarding perceived safety concerns. The FAA IGNORED those concerns back then eventhough that runway was, at that time, used approximatley 40% of the time by aircraft that were by no means up to present day technology. This airport at that time and prior was always considered to be a niche airport, basically a medium size facility serving a market such as that provided for by Southwest airlines. All studies showed limited to NO demand for long haul, non-stop destinations. Longer runways were NOT considered necessary or feasible at Green.

The current system of review expects people like Mr. Jenkins to fall by the wayside, drop out, give up, OR like you suggested "Move". Fortunately, he did not. You call people like him "complainers". Others consider hiim a check on a system that has up to this point given us a NOLINC garage that costs $270 Million to build, and a Post Road that has enough empty lots and buildings that looks like it should be the gateway to Irag instead of Warwick.

From: Council ‘played’ to avoid federal disclosure over airport projects

Please explain the inappropriate content below.