Report Inappropriate Comments

Well we do know that one person (nayler) was caught taking stuff and videos came out regarding wasted time by city employees, and we know that public agencies can almost ALWAYS stand some oversight and improvement. So the anti-cote side taking the position that the city is perfect and a hapless victim, is just ridiculous. And the claim that this article is somehow pro-cote is also not how I read it, I saw just the opposite. I see the garden variety "concerned citizen" in cote, and push back in these comments by city-side folks here in these comments who bring up personal attacks and make accusations against cote and this newspaper of some kind of collusion, all in an article that basically exonerates the city. so, WHO has a vendetta mindset again? I have in the past even criticized the beacon in these comments sections but this time I see a report that just kind of states facts that the relevant authorities find the loam situation inconclusive.

From: WPD can‘t link any dirty work to Channel 12 report of loam theft

Please explain the inappropriate content below.