Report Inappropriate Comments

I have a few solutions. The first being why don't we reduce city government? The state made it's employees trim pensions, contribute more annually to health insurance and froze pay. What has the city of Warwick done to meaningfully reduce benefits to it's employees? What has Warwick done to lower it's workforce? The mayors budget has an increase in overtime for police and firefighters while continuing to raise property taxes. When the schools say they don't have enough money, the mayor says cut costs, however when the city side of the budget inflates he blames it on people challenging their home assessments? What a joke! Another solution...hire qualified people to perform the work of the taxpayers. I'm sorry but if somebody is making over $30,000 a year for 19 hours of work a week can we please make sure they're qualified! Spare me the "they scored points in other areas"...those points were likely scored in the "reference" column based on a friend of a friend. Also I'm not sure how it's playing"Monday morning quarterback" for anyone to question this hiring. The language in the original job posting itself disqualifies her from being considered. That's just a fact. Ward 5 Resident if you are happy with the condition of this city than I don't know what planet you're living on. The school committee, WSA, the mayors office, DPW are failing the people of this city. People like you who defend this stupidity are exactly what's wrong with Warwick today!!!

From: Citizens question auditor qualifications

Please explain the inappropriate content below.