Amidst debate, 2 union contracts ratified

Posted

In front of a full chamber Monday night, the Warwick City Council voted 5-3 to ratify new three-year union contracts for police and municipal workers.

While the entire council was in agreement that both parties deserved raises that were promised in negotiation, arguments erupted over whether the city can afford to pay for them.

“Obviously we're pleased from the perspective that it does get rid of a distraction and allows us to focus exclusively on our job,” said Col. Stephen M. McCartney, chief of police, on Tuesday. “We're happy we have a contract here for the rank and file but at the same time we understand we may be going into some challenging fiscal times here. I got the message [from the council] loud and clear.”

Council members went back and forth over the merits of the contracts, with the discussion hinging on the stability of Warwick’s financial future.

“There’s a matter of our city workers, our police officers,” said Ward 2 Councilman Jeremy Rix. “Yes, they absolutely deserve these raises and these benefits, but how can we pay for it in the long term? Because then in the long term a receiver comes in. The last thing we need is for that to happen. That’s the absolutely worst case scenario.”

Rix’s words were mirrored by other council members, who all agreed that giving out raises was the right thing to do. Councilwoman Donna M. Travis, Ward 9, said “they deserve it,” and Councilman Stephen P. McAllister said, “These people are here to protect and serve. They worked with us in the past, and I think they’ll work with us in the future.”

On the other hand, some council members stressed the financial implications of ratifying the contracts.

“This city is beyond the question of solvency if we continue on the path that we’re on,” said Ward 1 Councilman Richard Corley. “We’re going to have the next generation taking on debt that is pretty much going to crush the city.”

Fiscal impact

The contracts call for a 2.75 percent raise for police and municipal workers. In a fiscal note prepared by former Finance Director Bruce R. Keiser, the effect on the budget in fiscal year 2018-19, would be $456,006 for the police contract, and $462,895 for the municipal contract. By fiscal year 2020-21, the final year of both contracts, that would increase to a budget hit of $481,432 for the police and $488,704 for municipal workers.

All told, over the lifetime of the two contracts, raises will cost the city just over $2.8 million.

Both of the contracts were negotiated between the unions and the administration of former mayor Scott Avedisian, before he resigned in May to take up a new position as CEO of the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority. Due to the transition and the need to finalize a new budget, the ratification of these contracts by the city council was put on hold in June until Monday’s meeting. The police union, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 7, has been working without a contract since June 30, when their old contract elapsed.

In testimony given to the Finance Committee before the council vote, FOP Lodge 7 president Sgt. Jedidiah Pineau said that Warwick was having trouble getting enough new recruits to fill the ranks, and that top candidates were going to other police departments in Rhode Island that show more stability. Pineau mentioned that the current recruitment drive by Warwick Police has fielded only 58 possible candidates, and that the department is short of the 175 officers it needs to protect the community.

Pineau also discussed the negotiating history of FOP Lodge 7 with the city. He told how the union had accepted staffing cuts to their ranks after the Great Recession in 2008, and the lack of pay raises from 2012 to 2015.

“We need to work on facts,” said McAllister, who voted in favor of passage and shared many of the same concerns the unions had. “The facts are we have information before us. The contracts were negotiated in good faith. This particular union has worked with us in the past. There are a number of impacts, not just financial, that we need to look at. We’re losing top recruits to other cities. We want to show them we have stability.”

From uncertain to approved

When the resolutions to ratify the union agreements finally came to the council floor, a number of different legislative maneuvers took place.

The police contract was brought up first.

Rix, after hearing most of the other council members speak, moved to delay a vote until the next council meeting in mid-August. He claimed that more time was needed to study the issue, as well as more financial information, before a decision should be made. 

“I think that there is some additional information we could get by waiting concerning the cities long-term financial outlook,” said Rix in a follow-up interview on Tuesday. Rix said a five-year financial plan is being conducted by the Providence accounting firm Yarlas, Kaplan, Santilli, Moran Ltd. (YKSM), as required by state law, and should’ve been available to the council by the next meeting if they had voted to delay.

But that delaying measure was beaten, as the council was not able to get a majority in favor. The vote split 4-4. McAllister, Ward 3 Councilman Tim Howe, Travis and Ward 8 Councilman Joseph Gallucci voted against the measure to delay.

At that point Corley made a motion to ratify the contract for only one year, instead of the hashed out three-year plan that the city and union had already agreed to.

“We have to do something to remedy, and entering into a three-year contract when we only have the money to pay for one year is bad,” said Corley on Tuesday, talking about why he moved to reduce the contract length.

The motion was met by loud boo’s from union members who packed the chamber.

However, the attempt to restrict the contract length was quickly shot down by the city council solicitor, John Harrington. He had researched the topic beforehand and determined that prior rulings in Providence showed that the city council could only ratify, yes or no, the agreement before them, and didn’t have the legal right to amend the contract length.

With that motion dead, the council moved to vote on the police contract.

Corley, Ward 5 Councilman Ed Ladouceur and Council President Steve Merolla voted against ratifying the contract, while all other council members voted in favor. The measure passed 5-3. Despite his motion just minutes earlier to delay the decision, Rix voted to ratify the contract.

“I wouldn't necessarily say it was a change,” Rix said on Wednesday when asked what made him change his mind following his motion to delay. “I'd say I had a preference waiting for a five-year report. But given the options it was preferable to vote for the contract at that time…While I would have preferred us to have all that additional information, based on the information that we do have and all of our knowledge from previous years as to the city's financial outlook, we did have sufficient info to make a vote."

Seconds after the police contract passed, the council moved to vote on the municipal employees contract. That measure passed the same way, with Corley, Ladouceur and Merolla against and all others for. Both votes were met by loud cheers from an audience full of union members.

“I think that there were legitimate concerns brought up this evening for both sides, and the fiscal information cannot be ignored,” said Mayor Joseph Solomon moments after the vote. He had sat front row during the deliberations. “I stand behind the council.”

Other than the pay raises, there were few changes to either the police or municipal contract. The police contract raises the cost for details and holiday pay, while the municipal contract increases vacation time for employees with between 6-30 years of experience.

Looking ahead

If both contracts had been turn downed by the city council, then the police would have gone into arbitration, while the municipal employees would have reentered negotiation.

In the aftermath of the vote questions still arise about the financial stability of Warwick. In a discussion on Tuesday, Corley was adamant that the city would need to start making better decisions if it were to stay in a strong financial position.

“We had received information from the accountants that next year we will have a shortfall of $5 million or more in the budget,” said Corley. “We have to face reality at one point or another. Next spring we’re going to have to find more money through taxes, and tax payers want no tax increase, let alone a max increase.”

But not all council members share Corley’s view.

“I have concerns like everybody else, but we can’t just be stagnant and wait,” said McCallister on Tuesday. “There will always be another report.”

The latest City of Warwick balance sheets show that the cumulative surplus is increasing. At the end of 2016, under the Avedisian administration, the city had a surplus of $22 million, and by the end of 2017 the surplus had increased to $29 million.

Council President Merolla was the one who put up the biggest fight to keep the contracts from being ratified.

“From this councilman’s perspective I don’t what to be the one who lies to people,” said Merolla Monday night. “I want to be on the record saying it’s not a secure future.”

Comments

6 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
davebarry109

The fact that the WPD only had 58 applicants is astonishing and worrisome. You cannot get a good recruit class out of 58. Not unless you lower your standards. The entire state is fighting for the same candidate pool. WPD used to be second only to the RISP. If it were up to me, I would lower the total number of officers, cut some specialty units, but continue to be competitive or tops in pay and benefits to attract the best recruits. You do not want to return to the days of neanderthal cops patrolling the city.

Friday, July 20
WwkVoter

dave I couldnt have said it better. WPD is first rate. unfortunately that means you can only go down pretty much. we need to hang on to the high quality of our PD.

Friday, July 20
richardcorrente

Dear davebarry109,

Warwick never had "Neanderthal cops", but today we have a wealth of technology making our police force many times more effective than ever before. Todays police make the officers of 20 years ago look much less talented but they were never "bad".

The rest of your suggestion I agree with. I have always been in favor of a HIRING FREEZE (see The Corrente Plan). It would protect the present employees from competing for assignments with lesser costing rookies, and as others retire or resign, Warwick's payroll expense reduces. I would sincerely hope that whoever gets elected Mayor will have the same "No Political Kick-back Jobs" attitude that I have. Mayor Avedisian gave taxpayers the cost of way too many of those already.

Happy Summer everyone.

Rick Corrente

The Taxpayers Mayor

Friday, July 20
Scal1024

I'm not sure why in 2018 with all of the threats facing us in our country, and an opiod crisis thats already hit us at home, why we would be taking police off the street? That seems like the complete opposite of how to ensure a better future for our city. A hiring freeze across our police and fire departments sounds like a public safety nightmare.

Friday, July 20
Notmycaptain

Rob must be on vacation with no internet service.

Saturday, July 21
Thecaptain

Notmy captain, here is a cut and paste for you. With 2 boats and a plane and more fishing gear than the seventh fleet, I cant be bothered.

I had big hopes for Joe. Unfortunately he has already made some major mistakes. He pushed to have the police and dpw contracts ratified before the 5 year plan was issued, before the RIPEC report was issued, and before the independent CFE/CPA report was issues. Postponing the ratification for a couple of weeks until the next council meeting was the right thing to do from a logical business perspective, but not from a vote gathering perspective.

Going on the Dan Yorke show and stating that he knew nothing about an outside contractor performing services for the council was ridiculous seeing that he signed the award and it was unanimously voted on by the council on 12/18/17.

Three freshman council members really screwed up by not acting in a fiscally responsible manner. For Mcallister to say that the 5 year plan is just another piece of paper was completely incompetent. Howe, Mcallister and Rix, have spent zero time looking at the fiscal stability of the city. In particular, when the council president looked at them and said "how are we going to pay for it, give me your plan", they stood silent and white as a ghost.

Now we have 2 freshman councilmen, on the finance committee, that voted against the finance chair. That committee is now broken.

Joe Gallucci who in the past I admired and respected made another grave error. When I approached him to ask him to hold the vote for 2 weeks he said to me that it is out of his hands and that he has been told what he needs to do. Manipulation for any reason is never beneficial in the fiscal process.

We will now see maximum tax increases for many years to come, every year. The rainy day fund will get depleted more and more every year. Copy and paste this last sentence, if I am wrong, stuff it up my whazoo next July 1.

Saturday, July 21