After four days of hearings, the City Council has shifted funds from numerous accounts in Mayor Scott Avedisian’s $288.8 million budget to provide an additional $1 million to road repaving and …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
After four days of hearings, the City Council has shifted funds from numerous accounts in Mayor Scott Avedisian’s $288.8 million budget to provide an additional $1 million to road repaving and schools.
However, Mayor Scott Avedisian is considering vetoing the budget because cuts leave certain departments lacking enough funds to last throughout the fiscal year. As of deadline yesterday, it couldn’t be determined whether or not the mayor would veto the budget.
Under the council’s budget, taxes would be raised the same amount that was proposed in Avedisian’s proposed budget: 1.16 percent, 23 cents on the residential tax rate. The residential rate, if the budget passes, would be $20.02 and the commercial and industrial tax rate will be $30.03 and $40.04, respectively.
Last Thursday the meetings began running relatively late into the night and continued throughout the weekend. The council continued questioning the purpose behind increases and reductions throughout the new budget.
On Monday night the council convened without the mayor and his staff to discuss the budget amongst themselves and the amendments they would like to see within the budget.
Councilman Joseph Solomon (D-Ward 4) began with a slew of amendments. Councilman Ed Ladouceur (D-Ward 5) also proposed a few of his own amendments to the budget. The council civilly discussed each amendment’s pros and cons before voting. Many of the cuts made reduced funding to levels used in the 2014 fiscal year. Professional services for the legal department was reduced $100,000, but even with the reduction the allocation was still increased by $75,000 more than the current budget, a solid “cushion” for the department, but not so much that it would cost the Warwick taxpayers, said Ladouceur.
Ladouceur questioned, “Where is the cushion for the taxpayer in these difficult times?” when he showed support for the amendment.
Seventy-five thousand dollars was deducted from the salaries of the city planning department.
It was believed Tuesday this would result in the loss of one or more Planning Department personnel.
Council Finance Committee Chair Camille Vella-Wilkinson said that would be an “unintended consequence” if it was to happen. Solomon said yesterday none of his proposed cuts cut jobs.
The largest reduction in funds came through a 2.1 percent reduction in funds allocated health care premiums, a $607,929.31 cut.
Solomon commented on the possible deficit that would be left in the wake of this amendment saying, “Based on what we were given, this amendment makes sense. The council was presented a deficit budget [the mayor balanced his budget with $3.6 million from reserves] from day one even before any of the amendments.”
Chief of Staff Mark Carruolo, on the other hand, said the $607,929 cut is not “fiscally prudent.”
Carruolo said, “To make up for the deductions from the city council, about 33 family health plans would have to be eliminated. Yes, our premiums had been lowered, but we have had an increase in memberships and the 2.1 percent reduction had already been accounted for in the budget. To say the new amount is unsustainable would be an understatement. The reduction would take money away from existing plans.”
Carruolo mentioned that last year there was about 20 new employees for the fire department alone and after they finished training, possibly eight more firemen by the end of the summer.
Solomon said that the mayor has yet to contact him since the amended budget was approved to discuss the issues it may present to the city.
Most of the amendments that did not pass concerned salaries for city workers from the two new maintenance positions at the police station, overtime pay for firemen as well as the pay of seasonal workers at McDermott Pool.
All together, the reductions total $997,292.31.
Solomon said, “This is what cooperation can accomplish. Almost one million dollars saved.”
Solomon then made his two largest amendments to the budget. After the controversy from the first night of budget meetings about road conditions throughout Warwick, Solomon suggested that $597,929.31 from the saved $997,292.31 be added to the previous allocated $450,000 to road repaving funds. This brought road repair up to $1,047,929.31.
Solomon said, “It isn’t a home run, but it is a step in the right direction.”
Ladouceur said ignoring Warwick’s infrastructure would cost more in the long run and showed support for Solomon’s amendment. Both he and Solomon suggested that every year $1 million, or more, should be allocated to road repair.
Steve Merolla (D-Ward 9) said $1 million isn’t enough to catch up on the damage done to the roads, but favored continuously investing in roads in succeeding years.
Camille Vella-Wilkinson (D-Ward 3) said that repaired roads would not only help to ensure the safety of their constituents, but also help promote the city as a place of business and be a good first impression to businessmen looking to expand.
The council unanimously voted yes on the amendment.
The final amendment discussed by the City Council was whether or not the remaining $400,000 saved from the previously discussed budget cuts should be allotted to the schools. Council members agreed that schools are a priority and they wanted to invest in the children of Warwick’s education.
Solomon said he would like to have the money go to sports, after-school programs and technology updates for the schools “to help formulate the characters of students as members of our community,” but was aware that there was no way to guarantee where the money would go once allotted to the schools.
The council discussed that money has, of late, been used to boost administrators’ salaries, not the teachers, and that kids are missing out when money is handled in such a way.
Pounding his desk, Ladouceur said, “You don’t cut the kids.” He preferred that schools and administrators be reduced throughout the system so that students can get the full benefit from the funds allotted to Warwick Public Schools.
Merolla, who has had four elementary schools close in his ward, said, “Our kids are suffering because of the decisions other people make.”
Vella-Wilkinson expressed her frustration that despite continuously funding schools, the public blames the council for a lack of funding when the council has no way of delegating where the money goes, only how much they get.
She said, “It is the administration that is discrediting the kids.” She wanted the $400,000 to go to the kids, but was wary because it is out of her power to see where the funds would go whether it would be to bump the salaries of administrators or to benefit the kids.
Steven Colantuono (R-Ward 1) said he would support the amendment because even though he couldn’t be sure where the money would go and shared the same frustrations as the rest of the council, he wants to fund schools in good faith for the students of Warwick.
The council unanimously voted to have the $400,000 be reallocated to the school system.
Solomon felt the money saved through budget cuts should be invested in roads and the school department because it is what matters to the community.
He said, “The public testimony at the hearings and the calls myself and my colleagues receive from constituents throughout the year show that this needs to be addressed as best we can with the limited resources we have.”
The amended budget discussed throughout the night was passed with a 6-3 vote. Avedisian will have until Friday to approve or veto the new budget amended by the council.
Carruolo said, “It doesn’t make sense to reduce the funds to a fixed line. You can’t take over $600,000 from a fixed line and move the same sum to another line like repaving. I agree the roads need to be addressed, but the money can’t come from a fixed line. The mayor can make a line veto but then has to equalize that decision somehow. The council made incorrect assumptions from what was presented to them and there are other options that need to be considered.”
He mentioned that the mayor had not yet made a decision on whether or not to veto the budget.
If Avedisian were to veto the budget, Solomon said, “I would vote to override his veto based on the facts, testimony and materials presented throughout the meetings. I have been involved with budget meetings for 14 years and every time cuts are made, it is predicted that the sky is falling. The sky never fell.”
Mayor Avedisian had not returned phone calls on the subject by deadline.
The proposed and amended budget can be found and read as a PDF at www.warwickri.gov.
8 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here
maggie123
That 400k they gave the school free and clear with no knowledge of how it will be spent...should have been placed in a Grant to the Schools in which they would have to apply for with a budget showing how every nickle spent and guide lines on how it could be used....COUNSEL if you are not a part of the solution you are a part of the problem. Taxpayers know how it will be spent on an outside consultant who will come back with the same suggestion that were made a year ago. Pilgrim is graduating it's smallest class ever 210 students....Shaking my head, can't make up this stuff...
Thursday, June 5, 2014 Report this
Scal1024
Maggie if Pilgrim has such a small senior class then why wasn't it chosen as the high school to be closed? More evidence that people around here have no idea what the (heck) they're talking about. Vets was called perfect for a junior high because of it's central location. Wouldn't you want the center school to be for high school students? Why is Tollgate not even considered? How is that a fair approach to this? There has been zero impact study on what it will do when kids are separated from friends and teachers that some have known for years. Good teachers will lose their jobs based on seniority. People say you can't be emotional when making this decision, maybe they're right. You can however be smart about it. Isn't the most important thing in the Warwick School system supposed to be the students? I agree the money should be monitored closely, but I also feel they same can be said for the city. Every dollar the city spends is certainly not justified.
Thursday, June 5, 2014 Report this
maggie123
So you would have been ok if they closed Pilgrim over Vets??? We live in the City of Warwick, in the State of RI, where there are counties all over this country which are larger than this state. So I have a hard time with the location issue. I don't think the committee was emotional in making their decision, I think it was the parents who were emotional. I would assume that Tollgate wouldn't be considered because it is the newest of all the HS and in far better shape than most of the schools in the City and it's campus houses the Vocational school. As far as your argument of impact on students being separated from friends, I don't think you give our kids enough credit. Plus I don't think it is a very good argument at all. Children attend school for an education purposes not because that is where their friends go. Again we live close enough to each other that if friendship bonds will continue to exist just outside of the school they attend. "Good" teachers losing their jobs based on seniority already is happening. Something else I disagree with. I don't think anyone should lose their jobs based on seniority, it should be based on performance and you can't blame that on anyone but the unions. Bottom line is (in my opinion) 400k should have been allocated in a manner in which it would be used to directly impact children in the classrooms. A school closing is inevitable and there will be a group of people unhappy over the decision, but that can't not dictate what needs to be done.
Friday, June 6, 2014 Report this
Norm88
You pundits crack me up!
Look at the big picture Warwick is an aged city and there are no young family moving here because of the school department is unstable at best an there is a failing infrastructure. Have you ever looked into the salaries of Warwick City official’s?
If your so upset about school funding it should really upset you to know what some of the city side folks make the Mayor $100,000 (reasonable in RI), His chief of staff $116,271, Public Works Dir. $116,310 just to list a few. There are 5 jobs that pay more than the Mayor on the city side alone.
Citizens of Warwick come next election cycle please make your feelings known at the polls, the same good old’ boy network needs to be dismantled city wide and we all need to elect the people that will consolidate city and school department functions and run this city lean and mean.
Friday, June 6, 2014 Report this
Reality
The school dept. should be taken to task but the 3 city councilors ( Travis, Vella-Wilkinson and Ladocesur) are a complete joke......shift the blame to the school committee so these 3 stooges don't have to address the structural deficit in the city.
The school dept could have saved millions this year by closing schools but Travis, Vella-Wilkinson and Ladocesur grandstanded to stop the closures. I hope the residents remember this on elction day and vote them out of office.
Friday, June 6, 2014 Report this
HerbTokerman
School committees should be abolished in rhode island.
New York City's school system is bigger than all the systems in ri combined.
We could have one managing body and one superintendent, one teachers contract for the entire state.
More purchasing power by increasing the quantity bought by one organization.
We would save a lot of money that could be put towards actual education rather than administrative bs and petty political fiefdoms.
Friday, June 6, 2014 Report this
Scal1024
I question the "$4 million dollars" in potential savings the mayor keeps talking about for school consolidation . Once again I will say if we are such a small school district then we really don't need all of these school administrators making more than $100,000 a year. Why don't we trim the fat of administrative salaries, and positions first. We continue to hire more firefighters, the overtime budget for police and fire goes up. This city needs to wake up, follow the money!!!!
Sunday, June 8, 2014 Report this
MadInWarwick
Why is nobody moving to Warwick? Our schools are on the decline and our taxes are too high. If you want people to move here and taxes to go down invest in the schools. The more people that come, the less we pay in taxes and for schools. If we continue at this pace everyone will leave Warwick and taxes will go through the roof. Why can't we control where the money goes in the schools? Unions. To keep our best teachers we need to break the unions and remove the current system of seniority and pay steps. We should pay the best teachers the most via a real pay for performance plan like the rest of the world does. Have you seen any other business that increase pay each year regardless of performance? The longer you're employed the harder it is to get rid of you? This just doesn't make any sense. It doesn't work in the real world nor in public schools. If the city level funds the schools or even gives a little more, you're taking away programs because all that money goes to salaries.
The city council has a ton of work to do as well as their budget is the real problem. Look at the school budgets vs the city budgets of the past. You'll see where the real increases are. Lifetime benefits for city workers? That's unsustainable. Get rid of the pensions and move new workers to a 401k plan immediately. The city workers don't realize they're won't be enough money to pay those pensions in the future so they won't let go. The rest of us lost the good pensions years ago, it's time for the city to as well. The Warwick Sewer Authority needs to be disbanded. It's terribly mismanaged and the budgets are also out of control. $30k for sewers on a $120k house is not realistic in this economy. Never mind the impending doom with the flood insurance premiums, that will cause a huge drop in the tax base and cause lots of old people to lose their homes. The values of house with $30k per year flood insurance will cause prices of waterfront homes to plummet as only cash buyers can afford them. Until these issues are addressed we're in for some very turbulent times ahead.
Monday, June 9, 2014 Report this