Posturing, blaming, overgeneralization make easy targets, but weak solutions

By Robert Haughtaling
Posted 4/28/16

Fear sells. It also is used by politicians to get votes. While using fear as part of a strategy is certainly not new, it is important for us all to step back and examine that which frightens us. …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Posturing, blaming, overgeneralization make easy targets, but weak solutions

Posted

Fear sells. It also is used by politicians to get votes. While using fear as part of a strategy is certainly not new, it is important for us all to step back and examine that which frightens us. Today’s political climate is proving to be extremely contentious. Party politics are being played to the extreme and the need for finding ‘bad guys’, to point fingers at, sates a craving for blame. All of this takes little leadership. All of this is destructive. Unfortunately, all of this gains traction because the general population’s fears have made us susceptible to jingoism and gross exaggeration. The present Republican and Democratic debates clearly illustrate this contention.

For certain, there are some concerns that warrant great attention. The constant turmoil in the Middle East, the economy, health care, prison reform, North Korea, Civil Rights, environmental challenges and cost effective energy are near the top of many people’s lists.

Politicians often resort to party lines when it comes to tackling these concerns. When this occurs we get slogans, vitriol, blame and eventually polarization. In addition, we see politicians targeting populations, excoriating other leaders and telling the general public that disaster looms if they choose the wrong leader. Really?

Somehow, America has survived having the White House set aflame, a Civil War, political scandals, the Great Depression, two World Wars, September 11, 2001, allowing Blacks and Women to vote (heaven forbid) and Aaron Burr shooting Alexander Hamilton. With this said, it is important that we scrutinize the messages some leaders throw our way. We should also consider how past crises were handled. Each era has it’s concerns. Choosing who will help guide us through them is one of our greatest responsibilities.

During their times in office, Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman and Ronald Reagan were heavily criticized. Washington was criticized when asking for too much Federal control. Jefferson’s career was marred by his relationship with Sally Hemings. Lincoln battled through the Civil War and suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus. FDR stacked the Supreme Court and sent Japanese Americans to internment camps. Truman gave the OK to drop the Atomic Bomb and later fired General Douglas MacArthur. Finally, Ronald Reagan had the Iran-Contra scandal that gave us Oliver North obfuscating the truth. These guys are considered, by many, among our best Presidents.

Other leaders like Ulysses S. Grant, Grover Cleveland, Warren Harding, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton have given us outrageous scandals. When today’s candidates say we are living in the worst of times, the other party is trying to destroy America and that Barack Obama is the worst President ever, they are minimizing some salient historical happenings. Look up Millard Fillmore and James Buchanan sometime. There have also been Senators and Representatives who have done some ridiculous things in the past as well. One of the most disturbing is Charles Sumner being clobbered by Preston Brooks with a cane on the floor of the Senate. We might be frustrated by the challenges presented today, but populism, nationalism and jingoism need to be tempered by rationale. People might be clamoring for change, but hope can turn to despair quickly. Who leads then? Posturing, blaming and overgeneralization make for easy targets, but weak solutions. Unchecked, that which sounds great can give us Huey Long.

Each generation of Americans will be confronted with the trials of their times. How we choose those who will guide us through these times reflects upon our character. Do we integrate or disintegrate? Do we shed a light of hope, or cling to the darker side of our fears? Fear has led to us bracing for the worst. Perhaps now it is time to embrace others out of a renewed sense of goodness.

Great leaders, while acknowledging their foibles, offer possibility. They respect the past, but beseech us to move forward, even in the most trying times. I can hear them say “I have a dream, that we the people, with malice towards none, have nothing to fear except fear itself, for the buck stops here”. Let us make sure we know where our leaders are leading us.

Bob Houghtaling, an occasional contributor to the Beacon, is the director of the East Greenwich Drug Program.

Comments

1 comment on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • Ken B

    When it appeared that Israel was in danger of losing this war, Nixon ordered a massive 20,000 ton airlift of American arms and equipment sent to Israel that helped Israel win the 1973 YOM KIPPUR WAR. Nixon then reestablished formal relations between the United States and Egypt in April of 1974 and negotiated the disengagement of forces between Israel, Egypt and Syria on May 31 of 1974. Next, President Nixon launched new Middle East peace talks in June of 1974 when he became the first American president to visit Israel, Syria, Egypt, and other members of the Arab Coalition in June of 1974.

    During his visit to Egypt, Nixon and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat traveled by rail from Cairo to Alexandria. Over three million Egyptians gathered at the many stations along the way to cheer Nixon and display signs that read, “God Bless Nixon”. At the conclusion of the trip, Nixon and Sadat created and signed the “Principles of Relations and Cooperation between Egypt and the United States”. The signing of this document led to the Camp David Peace Accords under the leadership of President Jimmy Carter.

    Friday, April 29, 2016 Report this