Convenience stores oppose cigarette tax hike

By Tessa Roy
Posted 5/3/17

By TESSA ROY Local convenience stores have penned a letter opposing Gov. Gina Raimondo's proposed increase on the cigarette tax, saying such increases would hurt their customers and businesses. If Raimondo's budget is passed, it would hike the cigarette

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Convenience stores oppose cigarette tax hike

Posted

Local convenience stores have penned a letter opposing Gov. Gina Raimondo’s proposed increase on the cigarette tax, saying such increases would hurt their customers and businesses. If Raimondo’s budget is passed, it would hike the cigarette tax 50 cents from $3.75 to $4.25 a pack, making it second only to New York’s tax of $4.35, and could bring in $8.7 million more in revenue to the state.

Signers from six stores – Shop-N-Go, Harss Express, Sam’s Food Store, City Line, Al-Mall Daily Mart and Gulf Express – in Warwick and Cranston said parts of Raimondo’s proposed budget, like an increase to the minimum wage, were “laudable,” but that a cigarette tax increase could actually hurt the citizens she’s seeking to help with a wage increase.

“Based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 27% of Rhode Island adults who earn less than $15,000 are smokers, while 10% of adults who earn more than $50,000 are smokers. That means those who would benefit from the Governor’s minimum wage increase would be hurt the most by a cigarette tax hike. That’s not fair,” they write.

Cigarette sales account for 32 percent of all convenience store in-store revenue, they add, and “every time the cigarette tax goes up, the number of people coming into our stores goes down.” Their customers often go to Connecticut or Massachusetts instead to purchase cigarettes, they write in the letter that appears in today’s edition. According to the Boston Globe, the tax in Massachusetts is $3.51, and Tobacco Free Kids lists Connecticut’s at $3.90.

Jail-Rahman, Shop-N-Go’s owner for 20 years, said some of his customers go as far as New Hampshire, where the tax is $1.78 on packs of 20 and $2.23 on packs of 25. He said he sells about 200 packs per week, but that drops by about half whenever the tax increases.

When these customers go elsewhere, “we lose not only cigarette sales but also the sales of other convenience items like snacks, milk and bread. And when we lose sales, we are faced with the difficult choice of cutting jobs and/or hours of our hourly employees,” the signers write.

A request for comment from the governor’s office was directed to the state Department of Health. The Department’s Public Information officer Joseph Wendelken said that when looking at economics of cigarette sales, it’s “important to consider” that smoking-related healthcare costs in Rhode Island total $614 million a year, with $216.8 million of the costs paid for by Medicaid. He also noted that changes in cigarette prices could impact the number of young people who smoke – the Department of Health spends a lot of its time working to prevent youth tobacco use as nicotine addictions are often developed during adolescence, he said.

“We know that youth smoking rates are very sensitive to price changes, such as the one being proposed in Rhode Island,” Wendelken said, adding that a portion of revenue generated from the 50 cent hike would be invested specifically in community efforts to prevent initiation among young adults.

The governor’s budget will go before the General Assembly in June.

Comments

4 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • perky4175

    why dont they raise the tax on alchol

    Thursday, May 4, 2017 Report this

  • richardcorrente

    Dear perky4175,

    You must know "Justanidiot". His spelling is very close to yours.

    But in answer to your question, they should raise the tax on all "sins" like cigarettes and alcohol and reduce the tax on other items equally. I agree.

    Happy Summer everyone.

    Rick Corrente

    The Taxpayers Mayor

    Thursday, May 4, 2017 Report this

  • JohnStark

    Richard,

    Your position is troubling, and implies enacting one bad tax in exchange for repealing another bad tax. It is NOT the role of government to pick retail winners and losers. And what, exactly, does the government deem to be a "sin"? Cigarettes? Alcohol? Steak tips? Burgers? Hot wieners? What's next, now that the camel's nose is in the tent? If you wish to garner my electoral attention, you would advocate a complete repeal of the state income tax. Which leads to the next logical question for which I can never get an answer: What specific state services do Rhode Islanders enjoy, as a function of paying a state sales tax, that New Hampshire residents do NOT enjoy as a function of NOT paying a state sales tax? Looking forward to your response.

    Thursday, May 4, 2017 Report this

  • RISchadenfreude

    Tax dollars would be better spent on addiction treatment for the Guv and General Assembly...is there a 12-Step program for compulsive spending (of others' money)?

    I'll bet their fabulous taxpayer-funded health insurance would cover it.

    Monday, May 8, 2017 Report this