Serpa, Crowley bill would require expanded coverage for substance abuse treatment

Posted 4/5/16

Legislation filed at the request of Attorney General Peter F. Kilmartin would provide that insurance companies must cover at least 90 days of residential or inpatient services for mental health …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Serpa, Crowley bill would require expanded coverage for substance abuse treatment

Posted

Legislation filed at the request of Attorney General Peter F. Kilmartin would provide that insurance companies must cover at least 90 days of residential or inpatient services for mental health and/or substance abuse disorders. 

Sponsored by Rep. Patricia Serpa (D-Dist. 27, West Warwick, Coventry, Warwick) and Sen. Elizabeth A. Crowley (D-Dist. 16, Central Falls, Pawtucket), the legislation (2016-H 7625, 2016-S 2510) would amend section 27-38.2-1 (“coverage for the treatment of mental health and substance abuse disorders”) to provide that insurers must cover at least 90 days of residential or inpatient services for mental health and/or substance-use disorders for American Society of Addiction Medicine (“ASAM”) levels of care 3.1 and 3.3. ASAM level of care 3.1 provides clinically managed low-intensity residential services and level 3.3 provides clinically managed population-specific high-intensity residential services. The coverage contemplated by this act would be based on the individual’s treatment plan and progress and in accordance with section 27-38.2-3 (“medical necessity and appropriateness of treatment”).

“We have too many people dying in our state from overdoses and this is in part because the brutal and harrowing cycle of addiction cannot be broken without effective medical care,” Senator Crowley said in a statement. “It is morally wrong to put these people back on to the street to fight their addiction on their own due to monetary insurance reasons. If we want our children, friends, and loved ones to stop dying from overdoses, we need to ensure that they receive the proper medical treatment without being refused by the insurance companies.” 

 Rhode Island, on some level, has recognized mental health and substance abuse disorder parity since 1994. However, Attorney General Kilmartin believes the State needs to make sure that parity is justly acknowledged by insurance providers. It is well known in this State, and across the country, that one of the biggest barriers to recovery is access to necessary treatment. In fact, many have suffered relapses, because they were released from inpatient treatment far earlier than they were ready for. This is most disturbing in those suffering from heroin and prescription opiate use disorders as this when they are most vulnerable to overdose. 

“As long as the prescriber or doctor is making diagnosis recommendations that are consistent with the standards of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, we should not be releasing patients back in to society before they are ready,” said Representative Serpa. “Years of mental or societal instability can often not be undone in a two-week hospital stay. We end up spending more money by releasing these individuals back to society before they are ready. They are often re-admitted for worse or more serious offenses. Getting it right after the first round of treatment increases that person’s chances of becoming a citizen who can function and work in society.”

Comments

1 comment on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • JohnStark

    This is not a role for government, but let's assume for a second that it is. This coverage should be treated like any other form of insurance (auto, life, disability, long term care). That is, a medical history is taken of the proposed insured to assess relative risk. If the proposed insured has a track record of drug use, mental health problems, etc. premiums should be proportionally higher. Otherwise, the cost of this coverage would be born by those least likely to need the benefit, driving up everyone else's premiums. If insurance companies wish to offer this coverage as part of their book of business and charge premiums commensurate with the risk, fine. But government involvement only serves to drive up the cost of doing business in RI, which can ill-afford such things.

    Tuesday, April 5, 2016 Report this