By JOHN HOWELL -- While the School Committee has approved an $85 million bond request to upgrade the city's aging schools, Warwick taxpayers might have to foot less than they think.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
While the School Committee has approved an $85 million bond request to upgrade the city’s aging schools – the issue comes before the City Council on Jan. 3 – Warwick taxpayers might have to foot only 60 percent of the bill and possibly less than 50 percent.
But General Treasurer Seth Magaziner recommends that, regardless of what share of the tab the state bears, the city should move ahead with the plan to underwrite the full plan.
“What we’re advising communities now, if they’re planning to go to bond this year, they should ask voters to approve the full amount because we won’t know what’s going to happen at the state level until November,” Magaziner said in an interview last week.
In September, the Rhode Island School Building Task Force identified more than $2.2 billion in deficiencies in the state's 306 public schools, more than $600 million of which are immediate "warm, safe and dry" needs. On Dec. 13 the task force unanimously recommended issuing $500 million of state General Obligation bonds for public school construction and repair over the next 10 years, with the first $250 million to be proposed to voters in a referendum in 2018. The proposal calls for another bond question of $250 million to be on the 2022 ballot.
"This isn't just about making bold investments, it's about making smart investments, and this report is an important step forward in a long-term process that will help our students succeed," said Ken Wagner, Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education in a statement.
Since Gov. Gina Raimondo named the task force, she is expected to include the recommendations in her proposed budget. It will then be up to the General Assembly as to whether it ends up on the November ballot.
Locally, the state report on school deficiencies identifies $190 million of Warwick school repairs. The state report put Warwick’s five-year need at $239 million. In its own assessment, the district prioritized projects to come up with $85 million of work over five years.
“I believe the $85 million effectively takes care of all the students in the school system,” said school business director Anthony Ferrucci.
Until the state school finance plan is in place, Ferrucci isn’t banking on state assistance, although after meeting with Magaziner last Wednesday he is pleased to learn state aid and incentives that could increase the state share of the program would apply to Warwick.
“That’s huge. It validates the action taken by the School Committee [in approving the proposed $85 million bond request],” he said.
When the task force report was first released, Ferrucci said he was of the opinion that 5 percent incentives for consolidation of schools and STEM – science, technology, engineering and math – programs only applied when districts were looking at “fewer and newer” schools.
Whether the City Council will buy into the $85 million plan is questionable, not because of what it might mean in added costs to the taxpayer but because some council members question the school administration’s ability to control costs and whether the city should also be looking at new schools.
Told that the state could conceivably pay half the cost of repairs, Ward 5 Councilman Ed Ladouceur and chair of the finance committee, said, “I still need to see does it make sense to repair.” He adds that the possibility of added state funding “doesn’t let us off the hook to do our own due diligence…just because we get 50 percent of it for free doesn’t mean you don’t spend it carefully.”
Yet, when asked about new construction – Ladouceur has suggested a “state of the art” high school or middle school, which he estimates could cost $120 million – he says, “where do I sign?” Ladouceur believes a new school would serve to reenergize the school system and go a long way in reestablishing the reputation of quality Warwick schools and as a means of attracting new businesses and residents to the city.
It’s an appealing concept, but as Mayor Scott Avedisian points out, it raises the question of where a new school would be built and, since there are two high schools and two middle schools, what would it replace. In addition, if funds were solely funneled into a new school, what would be done to all the other schools facing deficiencies? If both repairs and a new school became the plan, how much would that cost and what would it mean to city property taxes?
Putting all the funds into a new school is of concern to Ferrucci.
“All the schools need help; all the students need assistance,” he said.
Ward 6 Councilwoman Donna Travis is excited by the prospect of additional state funding. She sees the need to address school deficiencies. She wants to see any funds for improvements “spent properly no matter where the money comes from.” Travis is inclined to support a school bond issue.
“If it’s going to help, let’s go for it,” she said.
In an interview Friday, both House Majority Leader Rep. K. Joseph Shekarchi and Senate Majority Leader Michael McCaffrey said they would support a Warwick school bond if approved by the council. Legislative approval is required for a Warwick bond referendum to appear on the ballot.
“What I would say to all school districts is that you should not put the brakes on any project because you’re waiting to see what will happen at the state level. Any projects that are approved this year under our proposal, we proposed that all incentives and all pay-go financing, to the extent that it’s available, would be available to projects that are approved this year,” Magaziner said.
5 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here
Justanidiot
i em glad the taxsprayers mayer did this for the citizens or warwick. the states of ri will pick up the tab and wes will be able to live hi on the hog. tank youse mister mayer.
Thursday, December 28, 2017 Report this
markyc
The Warwick School Committee/Administration needs to acquire a good public perception before Warwick taxpayers are asked to fund a "State of the Art" high school or middle school. The City can't rely on anticipated/hoped for assistance from the State of RI. Whatever assistance is provided is NOT FREE; it is provided by State taxpayers of which Warwick taxpayers are part of. The City should only bond for improvements at this point; there are numerous needs at almost every school building & that would allow improvements to be made at almost all levels/locations. Almost every city/town in the State is likely to request some assistance; I don't see how a 50 % reimbursement rate of assistance would be achievable unless it's for "shovel ready " projects & then the State bond money would be gone(maybe some cities/towns might be out of luck?). One thing should be certain; NO additional improvements should be made to school administrative offices/buildings until EVERY school building has been addressed. The Warwick School Committee couldn't meet the new teachers contract requirements(to pay retroactive pay by Dec. 22) & they've had problems with the consolidation process to date. The forthcoming school year has additional consolidation measures occurring; add to that planned improvements regarding proposed bond funding of $ 85 million. One has difficulty believing that the Warwick School Committee/Administration will be able to manage all it has going on without additional problems based on its track record.
Wednesday, January 3, 2018 Report this
wwkvoter
I'm in favor of investing to update our obsolete school infrastructure. Our students are the next generation who will create the next wave of prosperity and progress. They can achieve those important things best with a good education!
Wednesday, January 3, 2018 Report this
patientman
The state might fund 35-50% of Warwick bonds. BUT, the state is going to fund 95% of the distressed communities bonds. Municipal and state representatives better be very careful how they approach the bonding for the state. Rhode Islanders will see an accelerated pace of the makers leaving the state in the next few years. The combination of losing SALT deductions and exponentially higher taxes are going to crush us.
Wednesday, January 3, 2018 Report this
wwkvoter
SALT (State and Local Tax) Tax Deduction was taken away but the married standard deduction is double to 24,000. So the average person/family wont be impacted. If you need to itemize your property taxes because you can "only" take a 24k standard deduction, then you're doing well enough and have a nice enough home to afford your share of municipal taxes.
As to the tax property increases, yes those creep up each year as the city costs go up, but I hardly expect "exponential" property tax hikes in Warwick.
Meanwhile, if we expect to keep the prosperity we have, then we need to properly educate every next generation that comes along. And we've deferred maintenance for so long that now, that bill has come due. I'm all for any funds that can come from the state toward that.
Just look at states that truly underfund their public schools for examples of how bad it can get. Those places often show the effects of a generally under-educated society, and it is not pretty.
Thursday, January 4, 2018 Report this