Community
Advertise with us
Today's top ads | Jobs | Cars | Homes | Yellow pages | Videos
Nurse heads campaign to de-authorize hospital union
by John Howell
Sep 15, 2009 | 1061 views | 7 7 comments | 19 19 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Unhappy with their contract and claiming the union failed to deliver what they expected, a group of Kent Hospital nurses continues to gather signatures in efforts to conduct a de-authorization vote.

“We’re getting there. We’re very optimistic,” says Jeanette Geary, an emergency department nurse, who started the drive only days after United Nurses & Allied Professionals Local 5008 negotiated its first contract with Kent. Nurses voted in the union last October, which the union hailed at the time as a victory for the nurses. Union representative Jack Callaci said yesterday, “a majority of nurses are working to make the union better and the hospital better.”

He noted that a majority of Kent nurses voted to unionize, that a majority approved the contract and that they are a democratic organization. He said that since gaining representation, the union has eliminated delays in pay step increases and that, with the help of the hospital, were able to save the job of an employee who was on an extended leave of absence.

“Working on workplace issues, that’s what we’re focused on,” he said.

By law, the nurses cannot seek to de-certify the union until the contract expires in another two years. However, the nurses can act to de-authorize the union, thereby exempting them from paying dues that amount to about $500 per member a year. Currently the nurses are faced with a forced dues clause. Technically the union can demand that the hospital fire a nurse for failing to pay dues.

Geary is also circulating Beck Letters.

This document, explained Patrick Semmens, legislative information director of the National Right to Work Foundation, removes people from formal membership in the union. This reduces what the union can collect for dues, as non-formal members are not required to pay for lobbying and other union political activities.

He said by signing a Beck Letter, nurses would be exempted from any action the union might bring for speaking out against the union.

Geary further notes that by signing the letter, a nurse will revoke the union’s ability to automatically deduct dues from their payroll.

But de-authorization is not a simple process as Geary, who initially supported the union and was a union representative, has learned. She has enlisted the help of the National Right to Work Foundation and has signed an agreement for legal representation. In order to conduct a de-authorization vote, 30 percent of the eligible group consisting of 666 nurses, must sign a petition. Once that has been validated by the National Labor Relations Board, the next step is a vote. A majority vote will de-authorize the union, but this is not a majority of those voting, but rather a majority of the membership, in other words 334.

That could prove difficult as 321, or less than half those eligible, voted on the contract in July. The vote approving the contract was 172 to 149.

While union representatives said copies of the contract were made available prior to the vote, Geary said this past Saturday that nurses still don’t have them.

This complaint is echoed by intensive care nurse Meg Webb, who in an e-mail to the Beacon said union representatives told her the document is being proofread in preparation for printing.

“This contract was already voted on and UNAP representatives assert that copies were made available to members. How is this possible if it’s still not available?” Webb writes. Callaci said copies of the tentative agreement were available at the time of the contract vote and that signed and printed copies of the final agreement will be available “in short order.”

Geary said her major issues with the agreement are that it fails to address staffing levels and job security, which she considers key to why nurses turned to the union in the first place. Also, she is not happy with the 7-day layoff provision in the contract.

According to information released after the vote, the agreement gives step 9 nurses what amounts to an 8 percent pay raise over two years. Nurses also are to co-pay 6 percent of their health care premiums in the first year that is increased to 8 percent in the second year. The hospital estimates the added cost of the contract at about $2.5 million.

In addition to issues with the contract, Geary said attorneys at National Right to Work Foundation are filing complaints with the NLRB regarding dues collections.

“Nurses have been told, and it is in writing from the union that nurses must sign an automatic payroll deduction form, or pay dues six months in advance. This is illegal. Nurses who participate on-the-job in this activity are involving themselves in illegal activity,” Geary writes in an e-mail to the paper.

comments (7)
« Forced UNAPism wrote on Saturday, Sep 19 at 07:45 AM »
You are all very inspirational. I am so happy to see the progress you are making. Keep up the great work and get rid of this filthy so-called union. Remember, you are not alone.
« Poor Richard wrote on Friday, Sep 18 at 03:18 PM »
Jeannette, you are 100% correct. Professionals speak for themselves. They do not pay their hard-earned money to have someone else do it for them, nor do they put colleagues in fear if they do not agree to what a union stands for. Unions came of age when RR workers and other laborers were being, well, railroaded, and there was a need for representation. Unions then did care for workers and did deliver better hours, pay and working conditions. Unions are now a business unto themselves and bringing in money is the only concern they have. They really do not care about us and they do not care about our officers except for the money they bring in, period.

I have a voice and I will not stop using it to speak for my patients.

« Jeanette Geary RN wrote on Friday, Sep 18 at 11:00 AM »
I am reading your ongoing comments, and will continue to do so.

What I am doing demonstrates: It's called having a VOICE, and we don't need to pay a union to have a VOICE, we simply have to SPEAK.

Nurses need to learn they ARE professionals. It is time they approached their working environment as the professionals they ARE, and they don't need to pay someone to do their speaking for them.

Nurses need to sign the petition for deauthorization, and sign a Beck Letter. The Beck Letter affords the nurse less dues to pay, retains their freedom of speech, and removes their membership. IOW, signing both returns their professionalism to them, instead of handing over their voice to the union, and receiving fines, and/or legal recourse from the union for any deviation from what the union dictates.

There are nurses who haven't signed the Beck Letter yet due to fear of retaliation from the union. My response to this is I refuse to live in fear. I can speak to managers, peers, or anyone. I am not going to crawl under the carpet, shake, and say "OK, do with me what you please."

It has already been shown the union participated in illegal activity in regards to dues collection. Not only were they coercive with nurses, but lied, manipulated, and acted in opposition to the law. The union has now conceded, but as yet has made no amends. Not the kind of organization I choose to associate my professional licensure.

Any nurse who wants to revoke their signature on the dues authorization card can sign a Beck Letter, and have this accomplished. They then like many of us will send their dues to the union by personal check once a month, as advised by our attorneys.

I'll keep reading, and thank you.

We will achieve our goal.

Jeanette Geary RN

jeanette_joy_ri@yahoo.com

« Poor Richard wrote on Thursday, Sep 17 at 09:41 PM »
Jeannette, thanks for working with all of us who do not want to be forced into union servitude.

The sentiment from pro-UNAP people that we need to work together may sound nice, but it belies the oppression that UNAP brings with it. Enforced dues for absolutely nothing. I don't know about the union supporters, but I can speak for myself and I do not need to pay $20/per pay period for that. I am educated and I have a brain.

Clauses that warn us to be good union memebers or we might be fired smack of the exact same thing that UNAP said it was fighting against. I guess it is okay if we say bad things about administration but not if we speak the truth about UNAP...
« UNAP is Done wrote on Thursday, Sep 17 at 08:53 PM »
UNAP has lied over and over. Our union VPs are not responsive and barely civil- the chronic malcontent who covers our area refuses to meet with us, is arrogrant and sarcastic and totally unresponsive to our concerns. We have no job security. Rose is saying some of us will reap 12.7% over 2 years from this contract - apparently she cannot do basic math. The staffing levels have not improved and the union failed to address this.

Only 172 nurses voted for this awful contract - that is way less than 50%. Sorry, Jack, but most of us are much smarter than Rose and we cannot be fooled by your lies. Rose is either ignoring the obvious or she is still sleeping on duty.

Jeanette, we are glad you have the good sense to speak up about the abuses of this union. We will prevail and we will not be ruled by a group of people that curtails our right to speak more than our administration ever did.
« Forced UNAPism wrote on Thursday, Sep 17 at 08:23 AM »
Go Get 'em Jeanette. Keep up the hard work. Let UNAP know that you & your colleagues will not just "Sit down & Shut Up." I am continually amazed at how UNAP gets away with the things they do. Someone needs to take a hard-lined look at their practices. This is now the 3rd group of individuals (in New England) "represented" by UNAP who are extremely UNHAPPY with UNAP and its' leadership. I am sure there are many more just waiting to voice their concerns. UNAP's slogan should read: "If you want lies, deceit, disrespect, and ridiculous contracts, come to UNAP. We'd be glad to take your money and then we'll ignore you." Unreal!!!
« Jeanette Geary RN wrote on Tuesday, Sep 15 at 07:11 PM »
A majority of nurses did not vote to approve the contract, only a small minority. The election was questionable because of UNAP's insistent of holding the ballot box between votes. A majority of nurses would be over 330, NOT the outcome which was 172.

UNAP has today decided due to the insistence of the law that nurses are allowed to send their dues once a month by personal check --- an action their pro union reps told nurses was not allowed.

Intimidation and threats are the means of UNAP. And when confronted with the law they finally admit they must abide by something aside their own greed.

A majority of the nurses as stated by the union negotiator are NOT working with the union at all. This is a misleading statement. In fact, only a select few are invited to meetings, and there are no minutes.

Most nurses are opening their eyes, signing petitions, signing Beck Letters, and absenting themselves from membership.

There must be a reason why.

We now have nurses from another state in New England joining us in our discussion, and sharing their "experience" of UNAP.

Our numbers are growing, and if this continues it will not be long before our election. However, I refuse to leave any nurse in the dark, or use intimidation tactics as the union does in order to simply collect money.

UNAPs illegal actions concerning dues payment, lying to nurses, and threatening firing them, was responded to by unfair labor practices, and so they heeded, acting as if their prior actions were null and void, absent even making amends for their more than haughty behaviors.

It has been noted to me that some nurses were told they would have dues deducted from their paychecks whether they signed the payroll deduction forms or not. This is only one dishonest method the union uses to demand its income.

UNAP will be receiving ~ $308,880 per annum from nurses at Kent, the local president's share $83,000 per annum at her disposable for what she determines is necessary, along with a years leave of absence as stated by the contract. Nice job.

So far UNAP hasn't even been able to muster the courage to send original contracts to nurses so they can see how their professional standing was traded for dollars. They reason? They state they have to "proofread" the contract. What for? The contract has signatures, and therefore is completed.

We will reach our goal. With UNAPs ongoing outrageous nonsense it will be easy.

Jeanette Geary RN

jeanette_joy_ri@yahoo.com

 
 
 
event calendar Icon_info

Thursday, 02, 2010
post a new event Icon_info

Warwick Veteran's Memo... 7:00 AM
The Warwick Veteran's Memorial High School...
EAST GREENWICH ART CLU... 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM
EAST GREENWICH ART CLUB P.O.Box 1608, East...
URI Feinstein Providen... 9:00 AM
URI Feinstein Providence Campus Urban Arts...
Warwick Mall Reopens
Warwick Mall Reopens
MORE Video Here