Report Inappropriate Comments

If I understand the school committee's position now, it is this: Taxpayers who paid for the Ragosta report can not have access to it, in part, because the teacher may have committed another act of misconduct which the SC also needs to investigate. Making the former report public would compromise the new investigation. Is that about right? All the while, a teaching slot is being kept open for the subject of both investigations, the demeanor exposed in both of which appears to be egregious, yet beyond the ability of the taxpayer to know about it, and how it was handled administratively. I am unaware of a more glaring example of a complete abdication of responsibility.