Report Inappropriate Comments

For just a sixteen month period ending last November, 27% of all purchases made by Mr. LaPlante have been deemed questionable. How far back does this go!? Did he simply take on an air of entitlement? Invincibility? Was NO ONE watching the hen house?

Mr. Cote may be a lightning rod for some (though not me), but it's hard to dispute any of his points above.

From: Actions in the wake of LaPlante affair

Please explain the inappropriate content below.