Report Inappropriate Comments

However gentlemen, you all seem to forgetting one thing. There is existing ordinance on political signage in this city. Due to that ordinance, and in the absence of the existing ordinance being challenged and the ordinance re-written, the ordinance is in force. So Rick, what that means is when your associate and political ally Wilkinson, erected a sign on a fixed pole , outside of the interior of the building, that sign was in violation of the ordinance. By the way, I have the ordinance and the ruling from the city. Much like the sign that you erected Rick, on your campaign headquarters, although the real estate management has a permit for signage, your campaign headquarters sign was illegal when erected on the building due to the existing ordinance, much like Mayor Avedisians sign on his campaign headquarters has been illegal for years.

So Rick, as a construction inspector by trade, I, (we) rely on one statement , and one statement only. Is the current issue at hand in accordance , or not in accordance with the applicable statute? You will find that your sign, Wilkinsons, and the mayors, were all in direct violation of the ordinance at the time the sign was erected.