Report Inappropriate Comments

Once again Mr. Corrente openly lies and attempts to spin the reality of the loss of his home due to tax default and foreclosure.

Facts are as follows. Mr. Corrente has been denied each and every appeal that he has put forth. The property has been sold and re-deeded twice as of this date. On 11/16/16 Justice Rubine entered the Judgement against the Defendant Corrente and awarded possession of the premises to Redstick Aquisitions. The judgement reads as follows:

The Plaintiff/Landlord has a judgement for possession of the premises listed above against Defendant / Tenant , Richard Corrente and the Defendant Richard Corrente, has unjustly withheld from the Plaintiff, possession of the above premises and by consideration of the court, the Plaintiff has recovered the aforesaid judgement and cost of the suit. Therefore, you are hereby ordered to execute this judgement without delay, causing the Plaintiff to have possession of the premises with the privileges and appurtenances belonging thereto, also, that of the goods and chattels and real estate of the Defendant Corrente, within your precinct. You are commanded to be levied and paid to the Plaintiff the aforesaid judgement and costs of suit and satisfaction of your fees.

Mr. Corrente appealed and filed an emergency motion for temporary restraining order on 11/17/16. Reads as follows:

The appeal of the eviction came before Justice Rubine on November 17, 2016. Upon information and belief, attorney George Babcock had suffered a mental health issue prior to the scheduled trial in superior court. On the day of the trial, Mr. Babcock failed to appear. Justice Rubine dismissed Plaintiffs appeal due to attorney Babcocks failure to appear and a execution for possession was issued to the defendant. Presently a constable and moving company are at the doorsteps of the plaintiff home.

On 11/22/16 execution issued as ordered. 12/1/16 Corrente motion for restraining order denied. 12/1/16 premises remanded to the Plaintiff. CASE CLOSED , DEFENDANT GIVEN THE BOOT

Mr. Corrente doesn't understand that when a case is lost in Superior Court and the judge tells you that you can appeal to district court as the plaintiff, your case has no merit in Superior Court and it's over. Its similar to getting a judgment against you, for example, to return a security deposit, not returning it, appealing the judgment, loosing the appeal, and then paying $25/month for 7 years simply to be a jerk to the tenant that you rightfully owe money to.

Interestingly enough, when you go to the RI Judiciary site and go to smart search, you find that there are 14 civil cases where Mr. Corrente was the defendant, all of which the plaintiff prevailed. There seems to be a pattern of behavior where bills and judgments are not paid even when ordered by the court. For the readers edification and entertainment, on the RI Judiciary site, you can see the pleadings that were entered in the case however, you cannot read the content. If you go to the 4th floor at the court house and go into the room to the right of the Superior Court clerks office, you can use the computers in that room. When you pull up the cases, all of the pleadings and all of the documents and exhibits can be viewed on the cases both civil and criminal. So lets stop the BS because some of us are not asleep.