Report Inappropriate Comments

Hello DanElliott:

You should be aware that the claim of lost businesses by the "fake" mayor is demonstrably, objectively false. It is a lie that he cobbled together from two unrelated sources, and that he has never, in spite of several reminders of its falsehood, corrected.

Please take a few moments to read the following article, which properly compares data from three sources and finds that Warwick has had no such reduction in its business sector. All of the information is supported with links and documents that you can review on your own: http://warwickpost.com/numbers-game-corrente-claims-of-lost-businesses-dont-add-up/

You should also know that the fake "mayor" has never produced any such documentation for his claim of 237 "PAC checks" to the current mayor. All he has said, in his typically bullying fashion, is that anyone questioning his assertion should look up the campaign finance reports themselves. Maybe you agree that this is hardly the kind of behavior that should be exhibited by someone who wants to be taken seriously.

His apparent pride in "not accepting" PAC funds completely ignores his total inability to attract even the barest of support from any donors at all; in fact, the current mayor raised five times as much in private donations in one quarter than the fake "mayor" could collect in an entire year. This is a man who sought to buy the mayor's office with his own money, plain and simple, and he is trying to maintain the facade of popularity by using this site to post his statements.

If anyone should apologize, it is the man who calls himself "mayor" despite losing an election 65-35% and who claims to represent taxpayers when he, himself, is a proven tax delinquent.

Undoubtedly, the losing failure fake "mayor" will continue embarrassing himself on this site in his next comments.

From: Sides divided on extending expired city labor contracts

Please explain the inappropriate content below.