Report Inappropriate Comments

Hello again Thecaptain:

It is a sign of the truth behind your words that the fake "mayor" resorts to, essentially, "NUH-UHHH!" as his reply to your prior comment. He still has not, as you have repeatedly asked, identified the line item or account in the city budget that would pay for his imaginary "rebate" before his supposed additional tax dollars are received by the city. This continued failure to recognize the fiscal irresponsibility of giving money away before receiving any is yet more proof of his complete unfitness to hold any office, as his refusal to factually explain the practical details of how such a rebate system would be funded within the structure of the city budget.

Do you find it hypocritical, as I do, that the fake "mayor" would espouse tax giveaways on the fallacious assumption that it would provide future tax revenue, when he himself is a tax delinquent? Would you agree that his documented delinquency proves that future revenue from new taxpayers can not be assumed as readily as he suggests? And do you find it pathetic, as I do, that he continues to advocate for tax giveaways as a campaign gimmick?

Also, perhaps you agree that he should be correct his own misspellings ["we can easily give a potion," "Forth-of-July," "Vella-Wilkenson"] before criticizing others for theirs.

We can certainly expect that he will continue to embarrass himself in his future comments.