Report Inappropriate Comments

Despite factual, objective information being presented to him, the fake "mayor" still insists: "In the 2016 Mayoral race for Warwick...237 PAC checks gave money to Mayor Avedisian's campaign."

This statement is false. Here, again, is the link for the period of Jan. 1, 2015 through Dec. 31, 2016, which can reasonably be considered pertaining to the 2016 campaign. As shown in black and white, the winning mayor received 28 checks from PACs -- not 237: http://bit.ly/2uH2JWG

That fact will not be changed by the fake "mayor" repeating his false statement.

Using the twisted logic of the fake "mayor", one can reasonably conclude that his loyalty is not to the honest, taxpaying voters of Warwick but to himself, since he was the source for $41,458 of the funding for his losing campaign, while $8,395 [20.3%] came from individuals: http://bit.ly/2uQ9jtZ

By comparison, the winning incumbent mayor received 93.26% of his campaign contributions, or 4 1/2 times as much as the fake "mayor," from individuals as proven by the information at the above link to the RI Board of Elections website.

One can also conclude that the fake "mayor" received no PAC checks because those organizations knew what thousands of honest, taxpaying voters in Warwick understood: There was no chance he would win the election -- and they were all proven correct.

"I am proud to be part of the movement that stopped taxes from going up..." If this is true, the fake "mayor" should have no problem finally providing proof of this claim, a quote from a city councilor crediting him with influencing their votes, perhaps.

The fake "mayor" will continue to humiliate himself in his future comments by claiming that 28 equals 237, accusing others of being "not much of a mathematician," and falsely claiming credit for the work done by actual winning elected officials in the city.

I look forward to joining the thousands of honest, taxpaying voters in Warwick in overwhelmingly rejecting his candidacy again next November and proving that the noise he creates will not distract them from his inadequacy as a candidate.

From: 4th quarter honors posted at Vets

Please explain the inappropriate content below.