Weather Forecast
53°, overcast
As a non-smoker, it's always interesting to me how the anti-tobacco lobby seeks to "...fight the devastating effects of cancer", "...increase funding", and "avoidance" of tobacco, but never seeks an outright ban on tobacco sales. Could it be that a ban on tobacco sales would result in the elimination of taxes generated from said sales, and thereby all but eliminate funding for outfits such as the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Volunteer and similar organizations?
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
