Weather Forecast
73°, mostly cloudy
Hello again davebarry109:
It is curious why ktt4 persists in trying to question the PR firm, after it has already been addressed. In comment on Oct. 19 answering a question like this, I pointed out that Martin & Associates claims "two dozen" of school districts and nonprofits as clients: http://warwickonline.com/stories/three-elementary-schools-closed-due-to-staff-absences,128524?
At every point where his question was answered, ktt4 engaged in moving the goalposts: First, the issue was whether any other districts paid for PR firms; then, when told that others do, he tried to make the issue whether Warwick's spending was in line with the other districts. Oh, he also threw in a false accusation that I'm the principle in the PR firm.
Then again, going by his prior behavior, perhaps it's not a surprise that ktt4 would try to revisit the issue on a different comment board, apparently thinking that it would work this time.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.