Report Inappropriate Comments

When you attack the messenger, it looks like you can't argue with any facts. If nothing else, you can't honestly say that Cote lacks his facts. As to whether he runs for office, you'd have to also argue that every single watchdog also has no merit unless they also run for office. Ralph Nader for example, Woodward and Bernstein, Frank Serpico, Daniel Ellsberg, the list would never end with people who made a difference using the first amendment to question our government , but some keyboard commandos here (who reap the benefit), say the whistleblowers and watchdogs need to "run for office" or their facts are not important? Really?