Report Inappropriate Comments

I agree with the three-strikes rule of sending notices to the students parents and after three turning it over to the Aramark legal department, but it should all be invisible to the child who, in my opinion, should always be allowed to have a hot lunch, even if it costs the taxpayers...or Aramark...or the School Committee...or Stop and Shop...or the Rhode Island Food Bank...or the Gel's Kitchen fundraising...or some combination of them. I believe that Aramark has a provision in their contracts for this issue.

In either event, the child needs to be left unashamed, and well fed.

That's my opinion.

Happy Spring everyone.

Rick Corrente

The Taxpayers Mayor

From: Lunch debt in schools up nearly $20,000

Please explain the inappropriate content below.