Report Inappropriate Comments

Scal, that information literally can not be repeated enough -- not only because it so clearly gets under the make-believe mayor's skin, but because it provides an accurate picture of his past behavior.

And all he ever says in response is that the information is somehow "fake" and that, because someone is using a screen name on this website, they can't be trusted.

What he doesn't get is that you and I and other commenters are presenting information that is true -- it's factual, verifiable, and can be found by anyone who puts in the effort to find it.

In the case of the article you quote, the Beacon is the source for the factual information that he lost his residence to tax sale. You're just quoting it -- that doesn't make it "your" information or that you are somehow responsible for its veracity.

And your use of a screen name certainly does not somehow make that information "fake."

He's simply unwilling or unable to grasp this fairly simple concept -- and that's his problem, one of many that he has willingly shown readers of this website.

Like you, I wonder how he will respond to your comment -- but, given his past behavior, I suspect it will be either ignoring your comment and repeating his lies on the new articles that are published; shouting you down and calling you a liar; insisting that the facts presented are false; or again complaining that you use a screen name on a site that he doesn't own or manage.

What we don't have to wonder is how this latest campaign of his will end: He will lose decisively.