Report Inappropriate Comments

Great point by you Mr Hall as far as police and fire being effected by a hiring freeze. This is the kind of thing I reference when I say there are no specifics to Correntes proposals. If the plan is a hiring freeze at WPD, WFD, DPW and all city departments then it starts to become a public safety issue. How does Rick know he could safely reduce these departments without any evidence he's ever looked into this proposal? I would NEVER support reducing our Police and Fire without OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE that such a reduction would not effect public safety (highly unlikely such evidence exists). The other problem is if Correntes proposal of a hiring freeze only effects hiring at DPW, and excludes Police and Fire then it is never going to save the city money, thus making it a poor proposal. Sure a hiring freeze sounds great, but once again when evaluated closer, it's another Corrente proposal that COMPLETELY MISSES THE MARK.

I welcome any response from Corrente where he tries to further explain his proposal in detail. As well as his voluntary pension buyout, an explanation of who's paying for his "advertising blitz" in magazines, posters, ad buys etc promoting Warwick. He can also explain tp voters what line item in the budget will fund his "buy a house, get a check" proposal that he's given little information about after almost 4 years of running for mayor. When any of his "Corrente plan" is put under a microscope, IT FAILS! This is why he avoids answering any specific questions about them. I'm sure if he does respond it will be more attacks on me, because he can't defend his own plans.