Report Inappropriate Comments

Dear Scal1024,

Just because some anonymous critic, with no real name or any credentials, "says" I'm dumb, when I have been studying pensions SINCE the 70's, doesn't necessarily mean that I am. You said that a retiree making $50,000 a year would NOT accept a lump settlement. OK, if he didn't, then no harm, no foul, and no cost to the taxpayer. And Scal, if that settlement check was $3million dollars the City would never go along, but what if there was a number somewhere in the middle calculated by an actuary (NOT you or me) that benefited BOTH sides, wouldn't you be in favor of it? A win-win situation is what I'm proposing Scal, not a one-sided agreement. But I think you already knew that. You were just trying to put a negative spin on another part of "The Corrente Plan", to benefit your guy who doesn't even HAVE a plan. Does he?

Happy Summer Scal1024.

Happy Summer everyone.

Hey Scal. Want to hear a prediction? I predict that when you are finally alone in the voting both, with just you and your God... you're going to vote for me. You haven't been able to find any valid reason not to (except the ones you keep making up), and everytime I answer one of your attacks I get to promote my "Corrente Plan". I think it's starting to sink in with you!

Happy Summer!

Rick Corrente

The Taxpayers Mayor