Report Inappropriate Comments

Cat, whatever the make-believe mayor says, I consider you an intelligent person who can think for yourself, and I appreciate your viewpoint as such.

The fact that he takes issue with you agreeing with other commenters -- who, like you, have done actual research and presented true information about about him -- is a defect in his behavior as a candidate, not yours.

And WwkVoter, let's not disregard the fact, as others have stated, that the make-believe mayor decided on his own to use this website for free political advertising, and then try to impose rules for its use [i.e., taking issue with the use of screen names].

We all have our own reasons for using pseudonyms, and honestly, it's been somewhat entertaining to see how much it bothers him. That entertainment value, though, has been reduced by his repeated claims that the use of screen names somehow makes the facts less true.

He's wrong. It doesn't change the public records. It doesn't change the logical conclusions that one can draw from those records. And it certainly doesn't mean that he's more credible than those records.

Like you, I have not met the make-believe mayor in person -- and I don't want to. He has willingly, consciously, and repeatedly shown his true character on this website; why would I ever want to be in the same room?

He has also not held public events to take questions about his statements, nor has he directly answered media inquiries about his questionable campaign finance activities -- so what opportunity has he given voters to actually know anything about him? Oh, right -- only his repeated comments on this website.

By the way, remember when he didn't answer the Warwick Post's questions and instead lied about its owner on this website? I do.

This is from the article about the GOP campaign finance complaint filed against him:

"When reached by phone Tuesday night, Corrente said he did not have an accurate enough recollection of the ad or his campaign finance spending reports to immediately respond to the Republican City Committee Chairman’s accusation."

https://warwickpost.com/gop-city-committee-richard-corrente-failed-report-full-page-pennysaver-ad/

And yet a month later on a completely unrelated article, the make-believe mayor posted a comment on this website that falsely claimed the writer of the article was the GOP chairman, suggested that he writer's speech was "slurred," and accused him of "extortion" because of his ad prices

http://warwickonline.com/stories/delays-in-trash-pickup-possible,131816?#comments

How could any candidate say he did not know about his own campaign spending, and then -- a month later -- try to smear the media outlet that asked the question?

Phillip may disagree with someone making a characterization about the make-believe mayor, but that's just objectively pathetic behavior for any candidate.

I will give Phillip credit for one thing -- he suggests that the make-believe mayor stop using this website for free political advertising.

I wish him luck, because up until now, the make-believe mayor has shown absolutely no restraint in making a disgraceful spectacle of himself on this website.