Report Inappropriate Comments

Bob_Cushman, thank you for your comments. I believe that people tend to vote name recognition more than to take the time to research each candidate. She is running on the basis of her past Warwick political history and political connections she made during that time. The same history that places her directly in the line of fire because decisions that she made then have helped to create the mess the city is in now. The same goes for Solomon. The question is who would make a better leader? I can honestly say that I would not want to see what type of knee-jerk decision Stenhouse would make if backed into a corner since she has clearly demonstrated poor decision -making during her time in Cranston.

Warwick finally has a chance to shake things up after years of the same administration. I feel that a vote for Stenhouse is a vote for Avedesian 2.0.

From: Stenhouse to collaboratively address city challenges

Please explain the inappropriate content below.