Report Inappropriate Comments

At a loss. How can Stenhouse disparage Solomon's record while at the same time praising the former mayor?

"“I feel that I think he had the potential of doing a lot more if there had been more cohesion and collaboration between the legislative branch and the executive office in the mayor’s office,” Stenhouse said in rebuttal, after praising the “stability” of Avedisian’s leadership for 18 years." All blame placed on the council and none of Avedesian? That isn't even logical. You mean to tell me that the mayor couldn't get anything done for 18 years, including the years Stenhouse served as well?

"Stenhouse maintained that she had learned from the event but that there were some “incredible misunderstandings” by the media leading the story to blow up into national headlines, but that she “takes full responsibility for them.” You never addressed them - EVER - and expecting everyone to move on from it and not make it a consideration during voting season is naive. You can't even be honest about this and you expect people to get behind you because you are a "people mover"? What does that even mean?

I feel as if Stenhouse is laying back on her years on the council and I don't really think her record in the business world is a highlight of how well she will do in office. Warwick isn't Mulligan's Island. It is a city that has complex issues and requires a certain level of competence to navigate. She left public life years ago and the landscape has changed. Just saying she could do a better job isn't exactly comforting. While I may not agree with everything Solomon has done over the past few months, I can clearly see he is trying to learn the ropes and work hard at bringing all sides to the table.

"“in my administration there is going to be no such thing as a ‘secret deal.’ People are going to have to work with the mayor’s office.” Did you forget this all happened under your buddy's administration? Stenhouse seem bent on trying to level this accusation on Solomon when it clearly wasn't a 1 man inside job.

Sorry, I just can't deal with Sue Stenhouse. I don't want someone thinking that they can just waltz back in to the city and take over because they used to work here. She keeps talking about all the negative rhetoric in Warwick but she is doing the same thing with her campaign. She doesn't want to be held accountable for her missteps but at the same time holding Solomon accountable to everything that has gone wrong in the city since he has been there. Its as if she thinks once she is elected, everything will be sunshine and rainbows. She knows how to get things done and by golly she will! Living in a fantasy world doesn't help a single citizen of this city.

No secret who will be getting my vote. He may not be perfect and he certainly has had a role to play in some of the issues of our city but I would rather place my bet on someone that is in the game than someone that has been retired for years and wants back in to shine in the limelight again.