Report Inappropriate Comments

Let me just remind voters to compare what Sue Stenhouse says, to what Sue Stenhouse actually did.

For example, she says in the debate: "“A leader brings parties together and creates consensus, they do not divide".

But in the fall of 2008 she produced and distributed a letter personally attacking a Warwick city councilor, labeling him "dishonest", "careless", “disrespectful” and "destructive" because she disagreed with his positions.

What Sue says regarding schools in the debate, "“I feel like this is such an important issue and it keeps getting kicked down the road".

What Sue did while on the city council. As a member of the RIPEC Municipal Consolidation Committee, had an opportunity to investigate inefficiencies in city government and schools but refused requests from member of the committee to let RIPEC study inefficiencies on the city side of the budget and the wide discrepancy in employee retirement benefits on the city side that would be a issues with consolidating services.

On Sewers Sue is critical of the lack of infrastructure investments in the system. What Sue did while on the council: She voted to appoint a chairman of the sewer board that spent half the year in Florida and other sewer board member with no experience resulting in project after project incurred millions of dollars in cost overages and no real plan to replace aging infrastructure.

I could go on with examples of Sue Stenhouse double talk and why she does not have the honesty and experience Warwick needs in its Mayor.