Weather Forecast
47°, overcast
"ANYONE who runs for office is to be greatly respected."
Not when they lie to people, fail to pay their taxes, and use someone else's website for free political advertising like the two-time election reject.
It may be news to him, but voters actually have standards for candidates -- and he deserves no respect for failing to meet even the barest minimum that honest, taxpaying voters expect from people running for mayor.
"That means that the day I stated my name four years ago, I was already MORE credible than them."
This is a lie. Getting one's name on a ballot is not a sign of credibility, nor is it license to repeatedly and willingly lie to voters.
"Before I campaigned one day or spent one dollar my accomplishments were thousands of times more than theirs."
This, too, is a lie. The two-time election reject's "accomplishments" were losing a property to tax sale and lying about it, making false claims about his tax bills, lying about the changes in Warwick's business sector and school population, falsely claiming credit for the city council's budget decisions,
His unhealthy fixation on the other commenters on this website -- who have, time and again, presented factual information proving his statements false -- is clearly meant to distract from his utter unfitness for office, which our honest, taxpaying neighbors recognized and answered with two overwhelming rejections of his candidacy.
Warwick voters have standards, and they will not be fooled. The two-time election reject's decision not to acknowledge those facts is a defect in his behavior, not anyone else's.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
