Report Inappropriate Comments

Cat, that's been the two-time election reject's premise from the beginning, that people using screen names (which is allowed by the owners of the site) are somehow less credible than his use of the website for political advertising (which isn't). He ignores this clear evidence that counts against him, of course.

And the fact remains that his earlier comment is false; he can not both call the council "tax and spend political insiders" in a paid advertisement and also say "this is the best council we've had this century."

Such glaring and obvious contradictions are, as we know, typical for him.

We can have another happy election knowing that we are among the thousands of honest, taxpaying voters who saw through his lies and rejected his candidacy again in September, rightfully keeping him off the ballot.