Weather Forecast
53°, overcast
"[I]f he lowered taxes he would increase the number of taxpayers and therefore Warwick would receive [more tax revenue]."
There is no evidence, of any kind, that Warwick could take on the numbers of new property taxpayers it would take to make up for a reduction in tax revenue.
"That was the point David Gardner was making."
No, it was not. Mr. Gardner simply said, "Lower property taxes wouldn’t be bad.”
The two-time election reject has no right to project his own delusional ideas on a successful business owner and actual taxpayer in the city.
Everything following the "2" in his comment is another series of delusional and false statements.
There has never been any tampering with the city tax assessments; no law will ever be written to use a local newspaper as "checks and balances" for a city operation that is already contracted to an independent third party vendor; property values on real estate websites are not, and have never been, correlated to municipal property valuations; and none of his claims about anyone else's tax assessments have ever been proven.
"Everyone should pay their fair share of taxes. Don't you agree?"
The two-time election reject doesn't. He didn't pay the taxes on his former residence and lost it to tax sale.
Honest, taxpaying voters will give thanks that they saw through his lies and delusional statements and were 100 percent correct in rejecting his candidacy again this year.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
