Weather Forecast
40°, partly cloudy
The article reads that the center pays for all utilities, insurance, and maintenance. My neighbor,a member of the center said they pay for all of their own staffing as well. So yes they pay $1 a year but currently from what the article says there is no cost to the city at all and in turn they are able to offer all of these great programs for the city for all ages of the community.
There are non-profits all across the state that are leased for $1 a year as I have never heard of a non-profit that could afford $3000 in rent a month. I guess the question is -- do we continue at $1 a year lease with no cost to the tax-payers and keep our only art center or charge them 3 grand which would probably force them to close and then have the cost to upkeep that building fall on the tax-payers to pay and loses our art center.
Maybe there is something I am missing but it seems like a no-brainer to me.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
