Report Inappropriate Comments

Wwkvoter,

I agree with most of your comment, the only issue I have is nothing was done secretly or quietly. Everyday in contract law there are MOUs that clarify intent of a contract. The sick time issue was simply a clarification of how the time would be calculated and carried from month to month. Something the city wanted. The 2.6 million pension issue was the city failed to negotiate the change. Nothing secret, no schemes. They did not negotiate the change. The union filed a grievance. It’s that simple. Anyone that tells you it was a scheme to make money has ZERO clue what they are talking about.

The funny part is the mayor wants to go back to paying sick time yearly. Best part about that is he has to make a SIDE DEAL” to do that. You can’t make this stuff up.