Report Inappropriate Comments

Three questions:

1. Can anyone name a school district that was academically floundering, and suddenly turned it around with a new building? I happen to like Ed Ladouceur, but the notion a new building containing the same students taught by the same teachers, led by the same administration is going to "...increase our academic excellence" is not supported by ANY data, empirical or anecdotal.

2. Curiously missing from all the talk is any explanation of whether the proposed building will combine both existing high schools, and result in Warwick having one large high school. Or, will it simply replace one of the existing schools? It's a rather critical question. The fact that it hasn't been discussed openly is very, very suspicious.

3. When was the last time the 'consultant' took the fee, did the "study", and came back with a recommendation to NOT build a new school? This just in: Consultants that take municipal money, then recommend against a new project are termed "out of business consultants".

Finally, you don't "rush against the clock" to spend $200,000,000!