Report Inappropriate Comments

Hey Jimmy,

I exposed the fact that the unused sick time was being manipulated by paying out an annual benefit on a monthly basis instead of annually and the remainder was carried over. A direct violation of the contract terms. Guess what, that is now removed from the contract now on the table.

I exposed the fact that the verbiage of unused vacation time was changed from 1/5th weeks pay to 1/4th weeks pay. That fraction was changed by Lloyd and Armstrong resulting in $100,000 of excess payments. That language has now been corrected in the contract now on the table.

So why are the issues that I exposed being changed back to the appropriate language preventing you boys from continuing to steal from the taxpayers? You and Apollo are right, I'm irrelevant. Oh, I forgot. "It was an accounting error" (Michael Corriero).

AHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

From: Ordinance opens debate on affordablity of city benefits

Please explain the inappropriate content below.