Report Inappropriate Comments

So in this article we learned that Mr. Cote does not understand what a representative democracy is.

I think Snapi’s proposal makes sense. As long as we realize that existing retiree’s healthcare can’t be changed because they have a property right to the terms they retired under. So legally there is an issue as well as morally. These workers had an agreement with the city. In previous negotiations raises were foregone and workplace rights were altered to protect healthcare. To change the terms of their retirement is morally and legally wrong. But if it truly is an issue why didn’t any of the latest CBA’s address it for current employees?

And obviously each union should have a seat at the table. But you all realize that the unions don’t represent retirees right?