Report Inappropriate Comments

@RoyDempsey here is where the insulting comes from your candidates platform what to reduce taxes and "pure numbers" with the state of the pension and health care how can you reduce revenue and still cover the costs of running the city? It is also insulting to run a campaign "based on numbers" and not explain to the people of the city how you would replace that revenue after cutting taxes.

It is also insulting that you think the people of this city don't know communities pay their pension liabilities year to year, based on how many retirees there actually are, and increase or decrease those payments as that number of retirees’ changes. As for The “unfunded” part of the pension liability which is why actuaries are needed to figure out how much the city might have to pay which would be based on average age of retires, how long they are "expected" to live and so on.

So the "numbers" your campaign used especially the unfunded proton of the pension were vetted by an actual actuary? who signed off on your "reports"...