To the Editor:
House Speaker Mattiello’s stadium consultant, Andrew Zimbalist, in a commentary piece (“Sports Facilities and Economic Development”) wrote: “Independent scholarly studies …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
To the Editor:
House Speaker Mattiello’s stadium consultant, Andrew Zimbalist, in a commentary piece (“Sports Facilities and Economic Development”) wrote: “Independent scholarly studies have found that a city, county or state should not anticipate a positive or fiscal impact from a new stadium or arena … a new sports facility by itself should not be expected to raise employment or per capita income levels in a community.”
Andrew Zimbalist and Roger Noll co-authored the book “Sports, Jobs, and Taxes.” They collaborated with others to study sport stadiums and their economic impact. In every case without exception their conclusions were the same. “A new sports facility has an extremely small (even negative) effect on overall economic activity and employment. No recent facility has been self-financing in terms of its impact on net tax revenues. Regardless of whether the unit of analysis is a local neighborhood, a city or an entire metropolitan area.”
There is widespread unanimity and consistency among sports economists (unpaid) that subsidies cannot be justified on the basis of economic development, income growth or job creation.
Someone needs to explain to taxpayers what benefits will accrue to them from subsidizing, or even leasing, prime waterfront property for a stadium in a putative economic development zone, particularly when they already own and subsidize a stadium in Pawtucket.
Mr Zimbalist recently commented: “There’s great potential in this ballpark [plan].” For whom?
John St. Lawrence
Johnston
1 comment on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here
falina
"Mr Zimbalist recently commented: “There’s great potential in this ballpark [plan].” For whom?"
Why Nick Mattiello and Gina Raimundo, of course....
Thursday, May 21, 2015 Report this