Different wallets, same source


Who’s going to pay the bill?

That, it appears, is the newest argument taking shape between the Warwick School Committee and the city administration. The bill is for $1.7 million to repair the leaky roof at Vets High, a condition that has been deteriorating for years and was referenced when an accreditation team visited the school in 2008. Back then repairs were estimated at far less, but because they’ve been put off the price keeps going up.

Last week, school business affairs officer Anthony Ferrucci recommended the committee use its projected $1.7 million surplus to finally fix the roof, thereby ensuring it would not become an issue that could place the school on accreditation warning by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges. More important, a new roof would arrest further damage to the building and bring an end to the bucket brigade that accompanies every major downpour.

But three committee members – Eugene Nadeau, Karen Bachus and Jennifer Ahearn – voted to reject the bid. They reason that the building is owned by the city and, from their perspective, the city should pay for the repairs projected to cost $2.2 million.

Nadeau put it this way when he visited the Beacon yesterday, “If you were a tenant in an apartment building, wouldn’t you expect the landlord to pay to fix the roof?”

It sounds good, and we see his point. But there’s a big stretch between schools and the city and the relationship between a tenant and a landlord.

For starters, schools are not paying rent to the city to use the buildings. And second, more importantly, it’s the taxpayers who are paying for both city and school operations.

We would add that property owners are paying regardless of whether they have kids in Warwick schools, just the way they are paying for police and fire services whether they use their services or not.

Nadeau said yesterday Vets would get its roof, although he didn’t say who would pay, nor did he offer to explain how, after rejecting the bid, the department would retain the quoted $2.2 million cost. The delay could end up costing even more.

We understand that those charged with running our schools are faced with daunting responsibility. They see the test scores and can make comparisons to the outcomes as reported by other municipalities and want to see Warwick improve. They want to put more into programs and view the costs to upgrade and sustain buildings as secondary to their mission.

Unfortunately, resources are limited. Like the city, schools must make choices. Putting off repairs again, or looking to have the city pick up the tab, which is not going to happen, won’t resolve the issue.

The money may come out of different wallets, but it all starts from the same account – that’s the taxpayer.


3 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment

Why are we fixing a roof on a building that is likely to close?

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

davebarry as much as I'd like to see it close it probably won't happen. They will lay off teachers before closing the building. The school system in Warwick at the top level is a mess. They clearly have no idea what they are doing except for asking for more money every year.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Maybe the money should start to come out of the pockets of the idiots "in charge" of this fiasco, ie: school administration. Let's face it, their only concern in the whole "school consolidation" debacle is what kind of new office they will receive and if it will be air-conditioned. Let THEM feel the pressure for a while, then maybe they will start to "get it" that it's the children, and not THEM, who are top priority and should matter here! Because right now, the only people suffering are the children! Get rid of d'Agostino and work your way down.

Thursday, April 17, 2014