Invest in state's tobacco program


To the Editor:

Tobacco use is the nation’s most preventable cause of death, yet nearly half a million people in the United States will die from tobacco-related diseases this year. Right here in Rhode Island, it is estimated that 1,800 adults will die due to their own smoking this year alone.

 March 15 is Kick Butts Day – a day of activism that empowers youth to stand out, speak up and seize control against the tobacco industry. Here at home, I believe it’s equally important to mark this day reminding lawmakers of importance of supporting proven tools in the fight against tobacco use.

Research shows that states can tackle tobacco use through a three-part approach. This approach includes regular and significant increases in the price of all tobacco products through excise taxes, comprehensive smoke-free laws at the local and state levels that protect everyone’s right to breathe smoke-free air and fully funded tobacco prevention and cessation programs that drive people to quit.

Over the past nine years, funding for Rhode Island’s tobacco control program has been slashed from $3.1 million to $375,622. These cuts are happening despite the fact that smoking costs upwards of $216 million in Medicaid expenses annually in Rhode Island, and $458.9 million in smoking–related productivity losses. 

As a volunteer with the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN), I encourage Chairman Abney and members of the House Finance Committee to invest in the state’s tobacco control program and reduce the number of Rhode Islanders that suffer from cancer, while at the same time saving the state in long-term healthcare costs.

Ethel Ricci

American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Volunteer



1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment

Simple solution: If you have a smoking-related malady, Medicaid will no longer cover it! Wasn't that easy? You're welcome.

As for the "...$458.9 million in smoking-related productivity losses", I'm guessing even Mr. Ricci has no idea where this number comes from, well intentioned though he may be.

Finally, as a non-smoker and member of the Leave Me The Hell Alone Party, why is it that every time lobbyists want more money from taxpayers, they frame the requested expenditure as an "investment"?

Friday, March 17, 2017